TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-22-2007, 01:34 PM
F16 1UB's Avatar
F16 1UB F16 1UB is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Villages of Hadley
Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

I received this e-mail from Military.Com and have contacted ALL of my elected officials. Take note.

Steve


TRICARE Eyes Fewer 'Prime' Networks
Tom Philpott | August 17, 2007
Some TRICARE Prime Networks Seen Too Costly To Keep

More than 168,000 TRICARE Prime enrollees -- those in managed care networks set up more than 40 miles from a military base or a base closure site -- could lose access to those networks and therefore pay higher out-of-pocket costs under new TRICARE support contracts to take effect in 2009.

Retiree advocates say a proposed change to the next generation of contracts, floated by TRICARE in a draft bid proposal, would encourage contractors like Humana, TriWest and Health Net to make more cost-competitive bids by dismantling provider networks that aren’t near military treatment facilities or Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites.

Cutting the number of Prime Service Areas, or PSAs, would save the government money, but it would hit thousands of beneficiaries in the wallet. Retirees, their spouses and survivors living more than 40 miles from base would lose access both to TRICARE Prime and also to TRICARE Extra, the military’s preferred provider option. They would have to shift to TRICARE Standard, which for beneficiaries is the most costly of TRICARE’s three options. The number of doctors willing to accept TRICARE patients also could tighten in areas where PSAs no longer would exist.

TRICARE officials declined to comment on the potential effect of the draft Request for Proposal, or RFP, which was released for review by potential bidders and other interested parties a few months ago. Officials said they don’t want to influence comments they receive. An official did emphasize that the RFP is only a draft. But the comment period in fact closed July 19 with few filed. A final RFP is expected to be issued soon.

The new contracts likely will be awarded next year, take effect in March 2009 and run for six years. Such contracts are vital to TRICARE, the health plan of 9.2 million military beneficiaries. More than half of all beneficiaries, roughly 5 million, are enrollees in Prime, the managed care option. Service members get care at no charge. Other Prime enrollees pay an annual fee of $230 for individual or $460 for family coverage, and modest co-payments for doctor visits, lab tests and hospital care.

Beneficiaries who prefer to chose their own doctors, or who can’t access Prime where they live, use TRICARE Standard instead, a fee-for-service plan. Standard users pay an annual deductible of up to $150 for individuals or $300 for families, plus a hefty share of all medical bills -- 20 or 25 percent of “allowed charges” depending on patient category. Standard users can be stuck with additional costs if doctors won’t accept TRICARE allowable rates. But total medical costs per family cannot exceed a $3000 a year catastrophic cap.

A third option is TRICARE Extra, also for patients not enrolled in Prime. Extra provides a five percent discount on co-payments set under Standard because beneficiaries agree to use a Prime network provider.

Because the military only has hospitals, clinics and staff to treat a fraction its beneficiary population, it partners with large private-sector healthcare companies to run robust networks of healthcare providers. Support contracts for Prime alone cost the Department of Defense an estimated $6 billion a year.

Humana Military Health Services, headquartered in Louisville, Ky., has the managed care contract for the south region. TriWest Healthcare Alliance of Phoenix services the western region. Health Net Federal Services, of Rancho Cordova, Calif., has the north region contract.

When these current contracts were let, companies were allowed to add millions of dollars to their offers by promising to establish PSAs for beneficiaries living far from any base. Contractors were rewarded, or at least not punished, for such initiatives. Even if they could not claim to be the lowest bidder, they could still win the contract by claiming best value.

The draft RFP for the next generation of contracts says specifically that bids will be judged on providing Prime networks only for “government mandated PSAs,” those near military treatment facilities and BRAC sites. Any additional PSAs “will be evaluated as neutral,” which means a contractor will not help their competitiveness in this round by promising to extend the number of PSAs beyond base catchment areas.

At our request, TRICARE officials gathered from the three current contractors their estimate on the number of beneficiaries enrolled in PSAs that are more than 40 miles from bases or BRAC sites.

Humana, which touts 100 percent Prime coverage across the South region, reports 90,281 beneficiaries enrolled in these non-government Prime service areas. In the North region, Health Net has 18 PSAs outside of government areas with 59,049 beneficiaries enrolled. In the West region, TriWest operates only eight of these PSAs. They have 18,738 enrollees.

No representative for any of the three current contractors agreed to speak on the record about the potential impact on beneficiaries if the next support contracts adhere to TRICARE’s draft guidance. One source said Humana officials are particularly upset, given their investment in creating Prime service areas across the South region. With stiff competition expected for the next multi-billion dollar contract, Humana officials reportedly see the proposed neutrality toward operating region-wide PSAs as targeting a key advantage they hold over competitors.

TRICARE Prime Remote coverage would be unaffected by the new contracts. This special program allows active duty members and their families assigned away from military treatment facilities to get whatever care they need, from whatever doctor they choose, without paying more out of pocket than they would if they were enrolled in Prime.



  #2  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:06 PM
ouma1938's Avatar
ouma1938 ouma1938 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 414
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

Steve, Thanks for the heads up. Do you know if this will affect Tricare for Life as well as Tricare Prime? Since my husband retired from USAF, Tricare for Life has been a lifesaver and while I wouldn't put it past the government to mess around with it, I am hoping they won't. After the "medical benefits for life" fiasco, this would be another blow to all service people and retirees and their families.
__________________
Johannesburg, London, Wiesbaden, Fairfield CA, Tokyo, Rock Hill SC, Myrtle Beach, Denver, Baltimore, Bangkok, Hongkong, Rutland VT, New York NY, Seneca SC, and next (and last stop as soon as we sell our house) The Villages.
  #3  
Old 08-26-2007, 06:55 AM
F16 1UB's Avatar
F16 1UB F16 1UB is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Villages of Hadley
Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

Quote:
Originally Posted by ouma1938
Steve, Thanks for the heads up. Do you know if this will affect Tricare for Life as well as Tricare Prime? Since my husband retired from USAF, Tricare for Life has been a lifesaver and while I wouldn't put it past the government to mess around with it, I am hoping they won't. After the "medical benefits for life" fiasco, this would be another blow to all service people and retirees and their families.
I don't know if it will have any affect on Tri Care for Life? When I took the oath in 1968 I thought health care was free for life. So much for that idea and we're also very concerned about the doctors that may drop being a provider. It's been proposed to reduce payments to them as well. I inquired about providers in TV for Tri Care coverage and see a limited amount of doctors (U.S. trained) locally. Any suggestions? We're still north but as soon as we sell we're heading to TV to buy.
  #4  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:52 PM
ouma1938's Avatar
ouma1938 ouma1938 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 414
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

Steve, yeah we remember the "healthcare for life" deal. Shoulda known better but I guess we all believed the promises made. But now we do what we can and as long as they don't mess with Tricare for Life too much retirees should be o.k once they go on Medicare. We've both been on Medicare for 2-3 years now and its been a lifesaver. And with TFL as the second payer we do okay. My husand had some major major surgery at MUSC in Charleston last November, was in the hospital for a long time, and we didn't have to mortgage the house to pay for it. Just one of the kids. Only kidding.

We are also not in TV yet, not up North though. Currently living in SC and hoping to sell our house as soon as we get it in the best shape we can to put it on the market. We were going to do it at the end of August but want to do some cosmetic maintenance first so may wait a couple more months. Hopefully the housing market will turn around in a couple of months too making it easier to sell. I hate to put it on the market now and have it sit for too long. Then it has to come off, give it time to be forgotton and go back on. Oh well, will keep me busy figuring it all out I guess. Less time to mope about getting to TV. Can't wait though. Barbara
__________________
Johannesburg, London, Wiesbaden, Fairfield CA, Tokyo, Rock Hill SC, Myrtle Beach, Denver, Baltimore, Bangkok, Hongkong, Rutland VT, New York NY, Seneca SC, and next (and last stop as soon as we sell our house) The Villages.
  #5  
Old 08-27-2007, 08:33 AM
Cliff Cliff is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

I have been retired from USN since 1974 and was shocked in 1982 when I went to the hospital in Newport, RI, and was handed my health and dental records and told to go find myself and family some civilian doctors because the Government was breaking it's promise and would not be providing me and my wife with the promised health and dental care for the rest of our lives. So much for promises from our elected politicians. I and my wife are now well over 65 and on Medicare. Although I also had medical coverage as a retired Civil Service employee, I SUSPENDED my Blue Cross and am enrolled in Tricare for Life. Truly a lifesaver. You will find that most of the doctors in and around TV accept Medicare and TFL as payment in full. I will agree that most of the doctors are not native born US citizens. This area is fertile ground for foreign born doctors. From news accounts it appears that the whole country has a shortage of native American doctors. I would not even venture a guess on why that is happening except to presume that American kids don't seem to have the intelligence to get into the field of medicine. That doesn't say much for our educational system in the US.
__________________
Pawtucket and Providence RI
Ottawa Canada
Saigon
Mildenhall England
Gretna La
Greenville, RI
Jacksonville FL
TV
  #6  
Old 08-27-2007, 09:11 AM
F16 1UB's Avatar
F16 1UB F16 1UB is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Villages of Hadley
Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 12
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

It aggravates the hell out of me the way our benefits have been reduced. Thank God my wife & I are both healthy.

Steve
  #7  
Old 08-27-2007, 11:23 AM
bamafan bamafan is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 307
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TRICARE PRIME THREATENED

Amen to being healthy. And thank you all for your service!
__________________
Ocala, Florida<br />Birmingham, Alabama<br />TV, Village of Duval
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.