Health bill vote delayed in House in setback to Trump, Ryan

 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 03-25-2017, 05:49 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Sorry, but you're dead wrong.

Trumpcare would have reduced the number of people who have healthcare...as well as continued the rise of ALL healthcare costs.

Just like car insurance that you 'don't need' because you don't file claims, there HAS to be a pool of those of us who will never file...for insurance to work.

"Encouraging" young people...is far from mandating it.

It still boils down to the basic political philosophy differences I outlined in my previous post...and you've shown nothing that disputes it.

Instead of parsing bits of Trumpcare, at least be honest enough to admit that you don't really care if all American citizens have healthcare...because if you did you wouldn't be saying what you're saying.

Is that so hard?



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

It's pretty obvious that you were too lazy to read the bill. Do you need instructions on how to download a PDF file?
  #32  
Old 03-25-2017, 06:39 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LargeBug
There you go...(unt told chachacha she is a liar!
I simply call them...as I see them.


I wonder what she thinks of the 'C' word...that you are so fond of?
  #33  
Old 03-26-2017, 08:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

since i, chachacha, do not have the patience to even read this forum most days, i have no idea who the people are who apparently all know each other and have pet names for each other. it dismays me that some names are very hateful and some comments seem very ill informed and some downright racist. i doubt our country will be able to bridge the divide if we cannot even bridge it on this forum. i think the person who is disagreeing with me seems to be doing it in a polite manner with cheerful emoticons waving, etc... we disagree, but there is no need for bitterness and vitriol. am sure she or he loves this country as much as i do.
  #34  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:19 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
See Also: Autistic Screeching.
And the beat goes on....TrumSupportersInaNutShell.jpg

GOLFERINCHIEF.jpg

Trips to Golf.jpg
  #35  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:45 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Do you feel better now? I really hope you do. I am hearing entirely too many sirens recently. Perhaps the stress of so much grieving over Hillary's massacre.

Trump is not a one trick pony. He has been accomplishing a whole lot of good things in the last two months. No one ever claimed that he was undefeated, just a winner. Hope you are not betting against America, because it seems that you are betting against your president.

And the beat goes on.....

Abusing stupid.jpg

Bait and Switch.jpg

BuckStops over there.jpg

Winning.jpg
  #36  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:52 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
My post was in reference to the exact same autistic screeching being posted on at least a dozen threads.
Sort of like your memes.
  #37  
Old 03-26-2017, 06:21 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default Old Days

I don't remember where I read it, but it was written somewhere that insurance and healthcare was much better before the federal government got involved. I, for one, think they are onto something.

Insurance companies, as I remember, did compete. I also remember being in the hospital and had to stay an extra day because the insurance would not pay anything before being hospitalized three (3) days or more. As for those with no insurance, they could make arrangements for payment.

In our town, routine care was done through the local Public Health Department of the State. They took care of the indigents who were without regular doctors. My mother, who was a local school nurse, got care for kids whose parents couldn't afford to have their own doctor. She did this through the various charitable organizations, such as the Lions Club, Shriners, even some of the doctors she knew personally, and some out of her own pocket, etc. Public Health even saw to it the kids received their required immunizations for school, etc., and that birth control was available. Mother's friend was the nurse at one of the Public Health Clinics. This nurse had a family in her care that had a new baby just about every year. The husband was disabled and not working. She approached them about getting the man a vasectomy. They said, "Oh no, the Church would not allow it." This nurse promptly marched herself over to the Church and told the priest that Public Health would continue to take care of the family, but that the Church would be responsible for ANY and ALL additions to the family. The man was granted permission for his vasectomy the next week.

This was also before doctors had to have all the high-dollar malpractice insurance because every Tom, Dick, and Harry decided suing doctors and hospitals was an easy way to make the big bucks. Very, very few lawsuits are because of actual malpractice.

Maybe a return to the old days would not be such a bad idea, after all. States (at least that's how it was in Texas) took care of their own who could not do it for themselves, and did it without all the so-called federal assistance and all their attachments/madates/and whatever else.
  #38  
Old 03-26-2017, 07:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I don't remember where I read it, but it was written somewhere that insurance and healthcare was much better before the federal government got involved. I, for one, think they are onto something.

Insurance companies, as I remember, did compete. I also remember being in the hospital and had to stay an extra day because the insurance would not pay anything before being hospitalized three (3) days or more. As for those with no insurance, they could make arrangements for payment.

In our town, routine care was done through the local Public Health Department of the State. They took care of the indigents who were without regular doctors. My mother, who was a local school nurse, got care for kids whose parents couldn't afford to have their own doctor. She did this through the various charitable organizations, such as the Lions Club, Shriners, even some of the doctors she knew personally, and some out of her own pocket, etc. Public Health even saw to it the kids received their required immunizations for school, etc., and that birth control was available. Mother's friend was the nurse at one of the Public Health Clinics. This nurse had a family in her care that had a new baby just about every year. The husband was disabled and not working. She approached them about getting the man a vasectomy. They said, "Oh no, the Church would not allow it." This nurse promptly marched herself over to the Church and told the priest that Public Health would continue to take care of the family, but that the Church would be responsible for ANY and ALL additions to the family. The man was granted permission for his vasectomy the next week.

This was also before doctors had to have all the high-dollar malpractice insurance because every Tom, Dick, and Harry decided suing doctors and hospitals was an easy way to make the big bucks. Very, very few lawsuits are because of actual malpractice.

Maybe a return to the old days would not be such a bad idea, after all. States (at least that's how it was in Texas) took care of their own who could not do it for themselves, and did it without all the so-called federal assistance and all their attachments/madates/and whatever else.
That worked in the old days...now, there are just too many poor minorities to take care of. half the population gets something from the government. A third don't pull their own weight.

Would your system back then have worked if the indigent numbered 1/3 your town population? What if your town was half minorities, would it have worked then? That's what we're dealing with now.
  #39  
Old 03-26-2017, 10:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE=Doofus Don Baldwin-That worked in the old days...now, there are just too many poor minorities to take care of. half the population gets something from the government. A third don't pull their own weight.

Would your system back then have worked if the indigent numbered 1/3 your town population? What if your town was half minorities, would it have worked then? That's what we're dealing with now.[/QUOTE

Wouldn't it be interesting to know what Doofus Don Baldwin did for a living? And to know he hates women?

Wouldn't it be great to run his sorry butt out of the USA and.deport him to Haiti?
  #40  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:09 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Would your system back then have worked if the indigent numbered 1/3 your town population? What if your town was half minorities, would it have worked then? That's what we're dealing with now.[/QUOTE

Wouldn't it be interesting to know what Doofus Don Baldwin did for a living? And to know he hates women?

Wouldn't it be great to run his sorry butt out of the USA and.deport him to Haiti?
Actually, as much as I deplore acting on racism/prejudice, I could get along with an honest Don better than I could get along with needy libtards that demand that everyone cater to their socialist tendencies of taking from the rich to distribute to themselves or the lazy. Don probably treats people better, even as a racist than hypocrites like the leftards on here.

I may not agree with Don, but I respect the fact that he argues with facts, unlike most of you leftards on here.
  #41  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:19 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy
QUOTE=Doofus Don Baldwin-That worked in the old days...now, there are just too many poor minorities to take care of. half the population gets something from the government. A third don't pull their own weight.

Would your system back then have worked if the indigent numbered 1/3 your town population? What if your town was half minorities, would it have worked then? That's what we're dealing with now.QUOTE

Wouldn't it be interesting to know what Doofus Don Baldwin did for a living? And to know he hates women?

Wouldn't it be great to run his sorry butt out of the USA and.deport him to Haiti?
Hey Sandy - are you letting Dimwitdave post for you??
Not only do you sound like him (insulting people's intelligence while making grammatical errors) you messed up on the quote feature...???
  #42  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:26 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MLGBTQ
Actually, as much as I deplore acting on racism/prejudice, I could get along with an honest Don better than I could get along with needy libtards that demand that everyone cater to their socialist tendencies of taking from the rich to distribute to themselves or the lazy. Don probably treats people better, even as a racist than hypocrites like the leftards on here.

I may not agree with Don, but I respect the fact that he argues with facts, unlike most of you leftards on here
.
You're lying again.

You absolutely agree with Racist Boy's hatred of minorities and his racism...you just couch it in vague support of his 'supposed facts.'

You do know don't you...that you're not fooling anyone?



Deepest Sincere Wishes:
  #43  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:32 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You're lying again.

You absolutely agree with Racist Boy's hatred of minorities and his racism...you just couch it in vague support of his 'supposed facts.'

You do know don't you...that you're not fooling anyone?



Deepest Sincere Wishes:
Did lil' sissy wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? Go have mommie fix you up a nice hot bowl of Polenta, and a glass of milk. You'll feel better then.
  #44  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lying(unt
You're lying again.
You absolutely agree with Racist Boy's hatred of minorities and his racism...you just couch it in vague support of his 'supposed facts.'
You do know don't you...that you're not fooling anyone?
Deepest Sincere Wishes:
You have done no better with Don's facts...he has had "his foot on your neck" a few times and you just ran off like a little (unt...why don't you prove Don wrong, if you can't then I guess you agree with him and are a flaming racist?
  #45  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBag
You have done no better with Don's facts...he has had "his foot on your neck" a few times and you just ran off like a little (unt...why don't you prove Don wrong, if you can't then I guess you agree with him and are a flaming racist?


I very seldom even bother completely reading Racist Boy's canned, cut/paste racist diatribes...as they're all the same.

The few I do respond to, is to very effectively...eviscerate his racism.

Only the ignorant (such as yourself)...agrees with him.

He actually thinks he's proving something, when he exhibits the traits that have actively led to blacks/minorities staying poor and subservient...then turns around and blames them for being poor.

That's a special kind of hatred and idiocy...that you two share.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:
 

Tags
happened, wringing, hands, people, donny


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 AM.