Originally Posted by Guest

Yeah, Jan and (unt spend a lot of time high fiven each other like a couple lesbians at an all you can eat seafood buffet...they are bitter that Crooked Hillary could not defeat Trump.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Who is this unt of which you speak?

Originally Posted by Guest

Who is this unt of which you speak?

The same person who also lives in your head...rent free.

Originally Posted by Guest

Oh Fredster, you're such a wet noodle.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I'm sorry I left out, their lack of civility and their inability to accept reality and defeat!
And a few are just simply ordinary run of the mill jerks!

Only 2 more days until

Originally Posted by Guest

The same person who also lives in your head...rent free.

Bitch don't live in My head just cause I **** with hers!!

one day until:

Or did that happen today?

Originally Posted by Guest

Just about ANY porn star or Bangkok momasan would be better than what currently haunts the White House for three more days. And thank goodness we were saved from having to see Chillary for another four years.

http://www.trueactivist.com/wp-conte...-1-400x266.jpg

what else does he pretend to do? Lets see...."criminal Hillary" is now,"“I was very honored — very, very honored — when I heard that President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton was coming today. And I think it’s appropriate to say. And I’d like you to stand up. I’d like you to stand up," Trump said, urging the Clintons to acknowledge the lawmakers and dignitaries in attendance.
“And honestly, there’s nothing more I can say, because I have a lot of respect for those two people,” he added."

Originally Posted by Guest

what else does he pretend to do? Lets see...."criminal Hillary" is now,"“I was very honored — very, very honored — when I heard that President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton was coming today. And I think it’s appropriate to say. And I’d like you to stand up. I’d like you to stand up," Trump said, urging the Clintons to acknowledge the lawmakers and dignitaries in attendance.
“And honestly, there’s nothing more I can say, because I have a lot of respect for those two people,” he added."

Actually its a smart political and might I add classy move by Trump. and if you were more objective you would admit that this is standard political fare. don't they all practice this approach. Its usually labeled diplomacy

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Actually its a smart political and might I add classy move by Trump. and if you were more objective you would admit that this is standard political fare. don't they all practice this approach. Its usually labeled diplomacy

Personal Best Regards:

I agree. If he said nothing, the liberals would be hitting him for it. So, he does something classy and they hit him on that. Liberals are never happy unless they make at least half the country unhappy.

Originally Posted by Guest

I agree. If he said nothing, the liberals would be hitting him for it. So, he does something classy and they hit him on that. Liberals are never happy unless they make at least half the country unhappy.

They're unhappy because they're jealous women and minorities who can't be as good as a white man...so they've ganged up on us.

EVERYTHING that is "white male" is bad...everything that is woman or minority is good.

Don't you see it? The smartest person, the boss, in most movies/TV now is a black man/woman...the exact opposite of reality. The hero is more and more a minority/woman...the exact opposite of reality. It's all fake...it's all delusional. It's fantasy to get them into the theater.

If a white man does anything, they'll pick it apart and find a flaw.

Originally Posted by Guest

I agree. If he said nothing, the liberals would be hitting him for it. So, he does something classy and they hit him on that. Liberals are never happy unless they make at least half the country unhappy.

Dear Guest:

All one has to do is take just a cursory look at the left's agenda concerning Trump and it becomes clear its a rigged "zero sum game for him. Its why I agree with Newt Gingrich when he said that Trump and his Administration should not try and reach out to be reasonable with the other side because they would only view it as a "weakness".

Trump's agenda is going to upset the status quo and in doing so he is going to upset a number of people who have been cozy and complacent in their safe spaces but yet ineffective with the execution of their responsibilities (ie he is going to remove a lot of dead wood). The progressives who rally against him are these same people and their manipulated sycophants.

Who could be against law and order? Who could be against policies both tax and trade that boost jobs, productivity and hence our economy? Who could be against a strong military? Who could be against people of belief practicing their religion? Who could be against the strict interpretation of the US Constitution in order to preserve its intended context and preserve this nation?

All of those are rhetorically questions except if your a progressive

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Guest:

All one has to do is take just a cursory look at the left's agenda concerning Trump and it becomes clear its a rigged "zero sum game for him. Its why I agree with Newt Gingrich when he said that Trump and his Administration should not try and reach out to be reasonable with the other side because they would only view it as a "weakness".

Trump's agenda is going to upset the status quo and in doing so he is going to upset a number of people who have been cozy and complacent in their safe spaces but yet ineffective with the execution of their responsibilities (ie he is going to remove a lot of dead wood). The progressives who rally against him are these same people and their manipulated sycophants.

Who could be against law and order? Who could be against policies both tax and trade that boost jobs, productivity and hence our economy? Who could be against a strong military? Who could be against people of belief practicing their religion? Who could be against the strict interpretation of the US Constitution in order to preserve its intended context and preserve this nation?

All of those are rhetorically questions except if your a progressive

Personal Best Regards: