Trump Admits That He Is Not Reading The Executive Orders He Is Signing

 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-27-2017, 04:06 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Since Trump signs an executive order, it would be prudent for a "President" of the United States to know, and to be able to defend, his order....if he doesnt read what he signs, and blindly signs his name to what underlings have produced, he is guilty of being at least being ignorant of the situation and at most being complicit in the order(s) that have been deemed unconstitutional.

Wasn't the oath of the office to defend the Constitution? and not subvert it?

Trump has shown NO KNOWLEDGE of the Constitution, nor the ability to read......welcome to the White House to a person who knows little if anything about what is involved with maintaining a Constitutional Democracy.
Sorry, but you don't get a free pass to criticize after what you elected in the last 8 years. The so-called Constitutional expert was shut down by the supreme court several times due to his UN-Constitutional E.O.s.

And let's not get into how many lies were perpetrated by the last administration and the corrupt Secstate.

So, if you wish to throw stones, either open the windows to your glass house, or first preface your comment with "I don't like Trump because...." and I will allow you to fill in the blank with his hair, skin tone, or that he is rich.

Otherwise, please stop your crying. It's very unbecoming.

Yes, I support Trump with most of his policies. I will admit it if I do not agree with anything he does. I think he is doing an excellent job so far. Much better than many of the previous elected that have occupied the position. To me, Obama was nothing more than a fancy voice, no better than a used car salesman. Obama was just Soros' puppet and a socialist or anarchist wannabe. The verdict is still out on that.
  #17  
Old 04-27-2017, 04:32 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Attachment 68074While signing an executive order in the White House, President Donald Trump revealed his attitude towards reading the executive orders that he is signing, and it confirms reports that Trump is not reading what he is signing as president.

So I want to thank you very much. So do we have the executive order, please?

So this is promoting agriculture and rural prosperity in America. And, now, there’s a lot of words I won’t bother reading everything. But agriculture and rural prosperity in America, that’s what we want. And we don’t want to be taken advantage of by other countries — and that’s stopping, and that’s stopping fast. Okay, thank you.

Trump’s attitude of there are a lot of words here so I won’t read them follows a pattern that has been reported that this president doesn’t read and that he doesn’t read what is placed in front of him to sign.

The President Of The United States prefers to get his information from Fox News, and would rather not read anything because reading bores him.

So, he can read? Evidently not.....
This continuing fascists campaign by progressives is going to fail because Trump, despite facing the most organized attempt to stop a president, is making headway with positive results. As those positive results continue the level of resistance will correspondingly drop.

Personal Best Regards:
  #18  
Old 04-27-2017, 04:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
This continuing fascists campaign by progressives is going to fail because Trump, despite facing the most organized attempt to stop a president, is making headway with positive results. As those positive results continue the level of resistance will correspondingly drop.

Personal Best Regards:
I agree. Even now, when asked who they would vote for if given a chance to "do-over" the election, the majority stated that they would still vote for Trump over Hillary. If the polls are any indication, then Hillary would now have a lower vote count than in Nov. The left are having a harder and harder time rationalizing their aversion for Trump.
  #19  
Old 04-27-2017, 06:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I agree. Even now, when asked who they would vote for if given a chance to "do-over" the election, the majority stated that they would still vote for Trump over Hillary. If the polls are any indication, then Hillary would now have a lower vote count than in Nov. The left are having a harder and harder time rationalizing their aversion for Trump.
Polls? Really? You STILL believe the "polls"?

Who said they'd still elect Trump? Republicans? The people who voted for him in the first place? None of the liberals would change THEIR vote to Trump.

Turn off the TV...it's no good for you.
  #20  
Old 04-27-2017, 06:42 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Polls? Really? You STILL believe the "polls"?

Who said they'd still elect Trump? Republicans? The people who voted for him in the first place? None of the liberals would change THEIR vote to Trump.

Turn off the TV...it's no good for you.
It certainly was not good for Crooked Hillary!
  #21  
Old 04-27-2017, 06:58 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Whoa, as always you put words in my mouth.

I have never broached or typed the word impeachment ever.

You can try to make me feel isolated by naming all the wonderful folks, but for a sitting President to blatantly lie is not acceptable to me. To have a sitting President make vile unsubstantiated felony charges is unacceptable to me.

If you and your followers condone that, then never call yourself a patriot. EVER


PS...I never even intimated he was a dummy. But to be clear, my statement about anyone who condones a sitting President lying unabashedly to American citizens, or making public accusations of felonies are NOT patriotic or even close. This applies to Republicans, democrats, progressives, conservatives, liberals or whatever. Condoning a lying President is the opposite of being patriotic, and guess what...that applies under any and all circumstances. You keep saying Obama is making him lie, or Clinton is making him lie. NO..he is lying because he knows he can get away with it. Whatever your choice, whomever you hate, condoning lying by the President is not patriotic. And again, we are not speaking of policy discussions. We are talking about complete fabrications
BINGO!

But to blind cultists and those who hated Hillary more than they love this great country, reason and the truth...will never register.
  #22  
Old 04-27-2017, 08:30 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
BINGO!

But to blind cultists and those who hated Hillary more than they love this great country, reason and the truth...will never register.

Have to add a little correction there - it was BECAUSE we loved our country that many of us could not vote for Hillary. Nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with the direction in which she wanted to lead our country.
  #23  
Old 04-27-2017, 12:29 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Have to add a little correction there - it was BECAUSE we loved our country that many of us could not vote for Hillary. Nothing to do with hate, and everything to do with the direction in which she wanted to lead our country.
........but I also disliked the poor excuse for a female politician. She is an example of all that is bad in the corrupted D.C. politician network.
But, I don't use that pansy, libtard, sissy term "hate" blatantly, like the leftards on here.

So, yes I would have voted for ANY other person, rather than that felon traitor. So, you leftards just continue to cry the blues and make excuses for Killary and I will rejoice in the fact that even though she has not yet been prosecuted, she still LOST. Hallelujah!
  #24  
Old 04-27-2017, 01:11 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default What trump says about executive orders

‘Signing executive orders was not the... - NowThis Politics
  #25  
Old 04-27-2017, 01:43 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
So this is promoting agriculture and rural prosperity in America. And, now, there’s a lot of words I won’t bother reading everything.
Again, read this quote. It's obvious to me that he's talking about not reading it aloud at the signing. If he had said, " I didn't read everything" you might have a point. But what he said is I WON't read everything." "Won't" is the contraction for "will not", and implies future tense, not past.

What a ridiculous grasping at straws to try to prove an absurd point.
  #26  
Old 04-27-2017, 02:33 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

I would take an educated guess that the average voter has had enough of the progressives "let's throw as much mud against the wall and see how much of its sticks" ploy..actually mud is not the word but in polite company.......

the average voter understands that the legislative process was meant to be slow and cumbersome but progressives are not engaged in this process and hence voters will tire of it quickly.

Personal Best Regards:
  #27  
Old 04-27-2017, 03:01 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon View Post
I would take an educated guess that the average voter has had enough of the progressives "let's throw as much mud against the wall and see how much of its sticks" ploy..actually mud is not the word but in polite company.......

the average voter understands that the legislative process was meant to be slow and cumbersome but progressives are not engaged in this process and hence voters will tire of it quickly.

Personal Best Regards:
Don't worry, Soon they will all be happy, it's rumored Shepard Smith has been put in charge of Fox News.
  #28  
Old 04-28-2017, 02:36 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Don't worry, Soon they will all be happy, it's rumored Shepard Smith has been put in charge of Fox News.
Did CNN or NBC purchase FOX?
  #29  
Old 04-28-2017, 06:39 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

The whole premise of the OP's statement is seriously flawed.

Again, read this quote. It's obvious to me that he's talking about not reading it aloud at the signing. If he had said, " I didn't read everything" you might have a point.

But what he said is I WON't read everything." "Won't" is the contraction for "will not", and implies future tense, not past.

What a ridiculous grasping at straws to try to prove an absurd point.
  #30  
Old 04-28-2017, 05:45 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Join Date: n/a
Location: n/a
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess this is no worse than Obama not taking his daily intelligence briefings.
 

Tags
reading, read, president, signing, executive

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.