Originally Posted by Guest

And it ONLY cost $10,000,000,000,000 ($10 trillion) or $30,000 per man woman and child, or $120,000 per family of four to do it! That includes the half the population who don't pay their fair share...it cost WHITE...WORKING families over $200,000. Was it worth it?

Not sure what your are ranting about.....

Originally Posted by Guest

Hopefully you are not intimating that Obama or his policies or his lies or his pandering to Islamic terrorists, et al, had anything to do with the stock markets growth.

He was the president, he did the stimulus package and his policies restored the jobs lost under the previous administration.

Bush and his polices are the reason we are still at war in the Middle East and ISIS exists!

Originally Posted by Guest

That was IN SPITE of Obama. What did he do to change anything for the positive? Nothing, is the correct answer. The economy was the slowest to respond in history. The recession had the slowest rebound in history of recessions and depressions. Obama was a hindrance, not a positive factor.
Obama has the record for being the ONLY president to NEVER have a 3% year average GDP growth during his tenure.
If you want more statistics on how poor the economy STILL is, I suggest a little reading at some of the government sites.

To coin a REPUBLICAN phrase...YOU LIE!

GHW Bush 2.1
B Clinton 3.8
GW Bush 1.6
B Obama 1.2

Jeb Bush says tax policies of George W. Bush 'created a dynamic effect of high growth' | PolitiFact

Maybe we should have had Bill as the First Man! The economy might have turned around!!!

Originally Posted by Guest

So then Trump is a genius, as his relative market gains since election outweigh Obama's.


O wait, I know you use liberal logic..... nothing Trump does brilliantly can be true.


O wait post election day gains belong to Obama.

Don't know how the conservatives continue to deal with the liberals here.

Cololdlady truely does not have the brainwaves to debate, maybe she can discuss world events with Tal, then rocky can write a dissertation about their discussion, then cnm, can give it an "o dear," Then fat boy can stamp it fake.

If I were a liberal then I would apply "liberal logic". I am, most likely, left of you but hardly Elizabeth Warren.

The stock market is soaring because they are hoping for HUGE tax cuts, deregulation and a more pro business climate.

The last time that happened WE THE PEOPLE got 2008!

Strap in it could get ugly!

Originally Posted by Guest

And it ONLY cost $10,000,000,000,000 ($10 trillion) or $30,000 per man woman and child, or $120,000 per family of four to do it! That includes the half the population who don't pay their fair share...it cost WHITE...WORKING families over $200,000. Was it worth it?

Your numbers are incorrect. And wait until Trump enacts his tax cuts for businesses and billionaires. Talk about making America's debt great again.....

Originally Posted by Guest

Your numbers are incorrect. And wait until Trump enacts his tax cuts for businesses and billionaires. Talk about making America's debt great again.....

We have almost no details on how he will fund the US government.

Progressives continue to side step embarrassing issues. "The topic is " what if Hillary Clinton had all of Trump's problems?"...not what Trump did or did not do will do or won't do.

The truth is the progressive establishment (all) only threw softball questions at her, provided her with answers to questions during the debates. Hide, denied, delayed or spun legitimate and factual scandal information in order to hide her criminality and poor judgments. She was a dud when it came to campaigning. She had no idea why she wanted to be president except that, she believed, her anatomy had given her the exclusive right to be president.

When the air clears and tempers abate the reality that Hillary Clinton was never a viable candidate for president will emerge

Hillary's candidacy was all smoke and mirrors . Think me wrong.
Well then ask yourself why did the DNC see fit to interfere and blunt Bernie Sanders campaign? Even they knew she was a loser.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

That was IN SPITE of Obama. What did he do to change anything for the positive? Nothing, is the correct answer. The economy was the slowest to respond in history. The recession had the slowest rebound in history of recessions and depressions. Obama was a hindrance, not a positive factor.
Obama has the record for being the ONLY president to NEVER have a 3% year average GDP growth during his tenure.
If you want more statistics on how poor the economy STILL is, I suggest a little reading at some of the government sites.

You might want to check your facts.....the last President to have 3% growth was President Clinton.

Jeb Bush says tax policies of George W. Bush 'created a dynamic effect of high growth' | PolitiFact

The Bush's were in the 2% range......

Originally Posted by Guest

We have almost no details on how he will fund the US government.

You're right - no details, no thought out plan.

POLITIFACT:

Trump said, "Obama is the first president in modern history not to have a single year of 3 percent growth."
We rate the statement Mostly True.

Trump's claim about weak economic growth under President Obama doesn't tell the full story | PolitiFact

Originally Posted by Guest

You might want to check your facts.....the last President to have 3% growth was President Clinton.

Jeb Bush says tax policies of George W. Bush 'created a dynamic effect of high growth' | PolitiFact

The Bush's were in the 2% range......

You may want to check your reading comprehension. The statement was that Obie was the ONLY president to NOT achieve an average year 3% GDP growth in history. Your information about Bush is incorrect.

Originally Posted by Guest

Your numbers are incorrect. And wait until Trump enacts his tax cuts for businesses and billionaires. Talk about making America's debt great again.....

My numbers ARE correct and if you disagree...post your own numbers Mickey

Originally Posted by Guest

We have almost no details on how he will fund the US government.

The same way previous presidents funded the gov. Spend the tax revenues until there is no more and then borrow what it needs.

Obama had no budget, so it makes one wonder why you suddenly have a problem with gov expense. Did you complain about Obama never having a budget, plan for funding the gov.? Of course not, he was given a pass. Why is that? Give me a reason why you libtards gave Obama a pass.

Originally Posted by Guest

The same way previous presidents funded the gov. Spend the tax revenues until there is no more and then borrow what it needs.

Obama had no budget, so it makes one wonder why you suddenly have a problem with gov expense. Did you complain about Obama never having a budget, plan for funding the gov.? Of course not, he was given a pass. Why is that? Give me a reason why you libtards gave Obama a pass.

Because he's black.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because he's black.

I didn't say that. But, the way he was treated seems to indicate that. Maybe the left is racist?