Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Most of us know this is exactly what you meant and intended.
We also know the tactic of re-stating to suit one's agenda which is obvious in a couple of responses.
We also know that those few accept no position other than their own.
Their trade mark is to label or snipe or diss that which does not follow their drum beat.
And then there is the usual name calling.
They are so identifiable and predcitable, changing the subject matter and adding no value.
The new tool they have is since we are all guests they can provide their own counterpoint and support.....which is also easily identifiable.
|
Dear Guest: Exactly its not that they disagree its that they fail to make an argument and their retorts are hateful leading one to conclude that they are not well suited for civil point counterpoint discussion
As one poster succinctly states ägree don't engage""
So even if one intentionally distorts what I said if I perceive it to be bait etc I will resist responding.
Let's look forward to learning from one another so that at election time we make the best choice possible
Personal Best Regards