I like to review events and reflect on what the legal outcome is compared to what I thought then. Once again, the conservatives were correct. Conservatives said this was NOT racially motivated, Michael Brown just robbed a convenience store, and Brown attacked officer Wilson and he defended himself.

Liberals went apoplectic accusing Wilson of premeditated murder of an unarmed, hands over his head black man yelling, "Don't Shoot!"

Of course none of the liberal fantasy had any basis in reality and was proven in court.

My question: why are/were conservatives far more astute in determining very early on what occurred? Are liberals "just not that smart" or was it ultimately just too difficult to make the facts fit the liberal narrative of racial animus?