Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
R
This isn't the smoking gun ...
|
I have a few questions:
If there's no smoking gun, meaning there's nothing to hide, then why didn't Hillary simply hand over the server to an INDEPENDENT and NEUTRAL third party and let that third party sort the private/work emails?
Once the work emails are separated from the private, Hillary is free to delete them and the public will never see them.
By refusing this request for a third party, and by already deleting some 32,000 emails Hillary deemed private, it sure gives an appearance of impropriety, does it not? Is her handling of this in keeping with a transparent Obama administration? Would this be indicative of her administration if she became president?
Finally, can you HONESTLY say this is the way you would like to see this type of "situation" handled?