Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
All the drum and chest beating over Hillary. So she fits the it is time for a women president attitude.
And I guess it is fruitless to continue to ask what her qualifications are just like it was a waste of time asking about Obama's qualifications.
One thing he has that Clinton does not. He has more than amply demonstrated what happens when a non qualified heretofore unkown become POTUS.
Sounds some some are willing to take that gamble again because it is a woman?
I really don't think so. I think if the dem's party line said they wanted Nancy Pelosi for POTUS.....you all would be touting how she is the heir apparent.
I think it is pretty embarassing to not even have another candidate or two.
Must be nobody wants to follow Obama in the job except Clinton. She presents more of the same and that should be what becomes her down fall. In addition to her suffering credibility.
|
It sounds like Hillary Clinton is the worst candidate ever, so how come she beats every GOP contender by double digits? What does that say about the republican candidates?
If Hillary weren't running, there would be at least a dozen candidates vying for the job, but it is hard work and requires a lot of money to win the presidency. Who would put out all that effort when they are certain to lose?
BTW: there's been no answer to the question 'who can beat Hillary'?
All you Mitt Romney fans should get a draft Romney PAC started, or doesn't he want to lose for the third time?