Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Dear Guest: I'll make a wager that you are in the camp of those that mock climate deniers. I'll make a wager that you argue on the side that claim that the term " Islam terrorists" is slanderous.
I'll wager that you hold disdain for religious people.
I'll make a wager that you would argue for government subsidies for as many abortions as a woman desires.
I'll make a wager that you feel very comfortable and secure having the government tell you how to live, how many babies you can have and what income you should be allowed
I'll wager you really believe all that you have quoted above.
Darn Catholics, can't live with them can't live without them...I mean who else can we scape goat for a nation's shame of killing 52,000,000 babies just because a majority of 9 people say we have a right to do so. And what effect do you think abortion will have on the future of the USA since it is upsetting nature's balance? Perhaps a look at china's population control gone awry will allow some understanding and why they hastily up'd the number of kids their citizen can have
You misrepresent or overstate in your above communication
some people just outsmart themselves
Personal Best Regards:
|
I'll wager that you didn't answer the issues raised and instead attempted to divert by posing a series of different questions.
Do you believe that doctors should be prohibited from learning how to provide care because the procedure being taught is against some religious person's ethos? Should government be imposing those prohibitions when absolutely clearly for the foreseeable future doctors are going to be needed to provide safe abortions for both medical and personal circumstances? How is the imposition of religious litmus tests on health care any different from your feared Sharia law except that the religion differs?
And to answer your ridiculous questions, you are wrong on almost all of them. So you would loose your bets. Now tell me should Christian Scientists and Catholics get to decide what is and is not taught to your future physician and available in your government supported community hospital or should all doctors be trained in the full range of medical and surgical skills which they reasonably might be expected to be required to provide?