Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonanza
I am incensed at the supposed outcome of this treeorama . . . .
that it is being dropped and closed at an apparent whim that no one wants to be bothered with it any longer???
A cold case that will remain cold ad infinitum???
I smell a fish and it stinks!
|
But I still don't understand, Bonanza. What do you suspect is the conspiracy? The bill, the fine, to the St.John's River Authority has to be paid. This happened last fall. That doesn't mean the district can't sue in the future if they find out which homeowner is responsible.
What am I missing? And thank you for the kind remark.
I don't get it. Who besides the people who PROBABLY had it done who wanted a clear view to the water could be at fault???? WHO would benefit? It is on a sort of island of land in Lake Miona behind four homes who reportedly (wasn't that in the paper?)had wood stacked behind their houses. The island does not belong to any of them. It belongs to the district, a kind of common area, a preserve that the St.John's River Authority has power over. It isn't the homeowners land but the homeowners benefited from a clear view to water. The land belongs to the CDD, i.e. all of us who live south of 466 are part of that CDD.
If someone stole all of the flowers from a piece of land in the middle of one of our streets and the district replaced them, we would be mad, but our money would pay to replace them. We could leave it bare. (But in this case The St. John's river bunch says to replace them)
. If someone saw a bunch of flowers in someone's yard that matched those flowers they'd be PRETTY SURE...but how can you prove that?
That is how it looks to me. How does it look to others????
I am hoping that someone is gonna find out and we on this forum will KNOW who did it and that landscaper is gonna be toast.
I HOPE Someone is gonna be found out. AND HOPEFULLY ante up, but you cannot convict someone even if they look guilty as hell. You have to have proof. Doesn't anyone watch true crime on TV like I do??? lol.