I am not an attorney (all of my knowledge of the law comes from "Law and Order" reruns) but I am pretty sure those property owners cannot be compelled to talk to anyone. Apparently there is no evidence against anyone. Like it not, our system protects both the guilty and the innocent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonanza
Gracie -- I know you can't make these four residences pay for the fine and new plantings. But I still think to depose these owners is a good idea.
I just wonder how it's "determined" who pays in some of these instances? What is the deciding factor? Just like residents south of 466 have to pay for the erosion under the bridge, as though no one north of the bridge or non residents don't use the bridge. In my mind, that is stupidity at its finest!
|