Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeod
I think you are correct. I recall TV entered into an agreement with the water district to maintain that area in its natural, unaltered state in order to build on the adjacent land. Because the trees were destroyed, the district was in violation of the agreement and required to restore the property. The PWAC will fund the project. The PWAC is funded by the residential CDDs below 466 which is why it is reported that only those are involved.
PWAC funds are used for other things. The new park near the Haciendas at Mission Hills was done with PWAC funds, I believe. And the bridge/island repair is likely being proposed for PWAC funding, again falling on the CDDs below 466. Not saying it's right, just how some things are funded.
|
The cost of the bridge/island repairs will dwarf the cost of the tree replacement. Estimated to cost up to 1.5 million, although a prolific poster on this site states this is a small amount, and until recently said it's all the fault of the "danged lawsuit". Who gets to pay for all this is outlined in the Project Wide "Agreement" set up by the developer and it is what the PWAC is bound to follow.
Here is the "agreement", and it's history, and as they say, for all of you south of 466, read it and weep!
PROJECT WIDE AGREEMENT AFFIDAVIT