I am glad he is certain. The problem remains that the only evidence of man's impact on climate change is from simulation models and they can't reliably indicate how important man's activities are on the naturally occurring climate change. By the way, papers are peer reviewed.
The only proposals are to reduce the burning of fossil fuels. It doesn't matter what the US does because China and India are the long poles in the tent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Funny, you're all funny. My best friend, who has a Princeton PhD in terrestrial hydrology and understands the literature better than anyone on this forum, is certain that human activity is greatly contributing to global climate change and that those changes are significant and will endanger millions of people in the next 50 to 100 years if not sooner. And climate change is the correct term because when the oceanic gyre is disrupted there will be areas that will become significantly cooler than they are now.
There have been many proposals for deceasing the damage, so don't claim that those liberals AKA scientists have no suggestions. But somehow all the proposals get stopped. I wonder by what consortium of people who profit from fossil fuels?
|