Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Two crazies from Arizona crossed the border into Texas to commit a crime. They were crazy enough to believe their actions would be meaningful but the event they attacked was ridiculous.
An anti-Islam group was holding a cartoon rally? It was asking for trouble and it is hogwash. If any of you readers believe this hogwash, just go visit you he Islamic Center on Hwy 27 near Clermont to hear what they preach. You will not hear them preaching hatred like the fool was doing in Garland.
|
Some people like you, in reaction to the Garland event, agree with the assertion that, since the Muslims “forbid” cartoons or other graphic characterizations of Mohammed, Americans should not engage in that activity. In other words, refrain and self-censor. People need to understand that, over time, this inhibits free speech -- which is something Islam is not comfortable with, sometimes trying to kill people who exercise it.
You also need to understand that the source of the prohibition against making images of Muhammad stems from the Koran and other Muslim sources , and is one (of many) aspects of Sharia law. In a nutshell, instituting Sharia law is what Islam is all about, and why CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood are helping to expand mosques across the country, including the one in Clermont.
I can cite many examples but will keep it simple and stick with three other key features of Sharia law:
- Stoning homosexuals to death for the crime of … being homosexual
- Stoning women to death who commit adultery
- Requiring a woman to have four (i.e. 4) witnesses in order for her to prove a rape case against her assailant.
Out of respect for Muslim sensitivities, which of the above features of Sharia law do your recommend we adopt in the USA, in addition to self-censoring free speech??