[kbace6]

Originally Posted by NorskiCroat

The point is: HE KNEW HE WAS BREAKING THE RULES. It doesn't matter if he ordered it or asked for it to be done for him. He knowingly broke the rules. That is the very definition of cheating. No need to make this up. It is a fact.

You're making an awfully large assumption that he KNEW that how he likes the football to feel was beyond the allowable league specs for such a thing.

But if you feel that strongly about it what do you think the penalty should be? To date the only suspensions brought down on players to the best of my knowledge have been offences against society. ie. Actually breaking the law such as drug use or assault both off the field and in the case of Ndamukong Suh on the field.

Since they can't throw a flag at this point all that is left is the $25,000 fine that is in the rules. So if you are for a penalty for breaking the rules you must feel that going along with the rules that are set up is appropriate maybe?

I'm still not convinced of any proof being shown, but whatever, its not a court of law, just opinion and he and/or even the team can handle a $25,000 fine. Let's just pay it and move on from all the haters out there.

Agreed?