Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I see your point. Use unmanned drones to do bombing strikes and not American soldiers doing the fighting. Makes good sense.
You do not support having American soldiers doing the brunt of fighting, if I read you correctly.
Should we care? Should we risk American lives?
|
I think Winston Churchill's answer still rings true to this day, and applies to this very topic ...(paraphrasing) ..."You can always count on Americans to do the right thing – after they’ve tried everything else."
The right thing to do is a) accurately describe the enemy as Radical Islam b) a leader / President (currently not applicable) explains to the people what's at stake, c) mobilize for Desert Storm II and 4) change the Rules of Engagement to approximate what we did in WWII when faced with a fascist enemy. We need to destroy ISIS totally, and that means use of tactical nukes if need be to destroy their cities. We also need to make sure Iran does not end up as the hegemon in the Middle East ... and DSII would help with that as well.
Radical Islam uses terror to make us afraid (ie the earlier post about what ISIS would do to a US captive). Historically, we have to make them more afraid while simultaneously exterminating them as we did the Nazis and Imperial Japanese.
The alternative to victory is to slowly watch the spread of Muhammad's writ and see your grandkids terrorized, and eventually in burhkas and using prayer rugs. Think about it ...
Oh, by the way, bring back the draft. Everyone needs to be in this.