Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
My guess on this is that they ALREADY HAVE IT...or they would not have said this.
Problem is for them how to deliver it here. That is what they need to work on and then just pick the target.
The religious group that gassed the subway in Tokyo, with sarin were working on getting nukes and had a seller but they had trouble also with the delivery system. This attack took place in 1995 and many books written on that subject have validated how close that was.
I do not think this threat is made unless they already have it, and simply need to deliver it
|
They may already have nukes, or not ... no one knows for sure at this point and, IMO, that includes the Intel Community. Very hard to penetrate ISIS with human assets.
However, either way, it tells you what they are aiming at. Pakistan is always teetering on the edge and they have about 80 nukes according to public sources.
For everyone who thinks we should not send ground troops to finish off Syria ... ask yourself this question. When ISIS finally gets their hands on a nuke, do you think they would have ANY hesitation to use it on whatever American city they could get access to? (hint: these are the same animals who burned a Jordanian pilot alive in a cage)
Ask yourself another question: in the wake of a nuclear terror attack on America, what impact do you think that would have on you, your family and your future?