I was determined to not post on this thread, but can not resist, any longer the need to know if I am the only one surprised how the article can address compensation the rioters and ease right on by the issue of why do rioters and protestors need to be compensated?
If there were no paid protestors what would the results have been?
What would the real, true picture of the Ferguson response look like if there were no imported paid protestors and rioters?
The limited coverage by the media of the area where the paid violence was taking place only adds to the phony reality of rioting by paid imports.
So now the real residents have to live with the reputaion and results while the paid thugs are back home or on another job of destruction elsewhere.
Where is the outcry from the real citizens of Ferguson? Where does the subject of paid rioters come up for review and it's impact by the so called Department of Justice review?
We americans are being had by a special agenda minority facilitated by the biased media. Tolerated by the majority. An extremely dangerous pattern of threat to America as we know it and as most of us want.
Silence by the majority gets what it deserves!!
|