Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
The old diversion technique does not play well for you. It does not work for you here nor on To-ix.
Anyhow, when a viable Democrat contender besides Mrs. Clinton emerges, they can be looked at with interest. The Republicans know O'Malley has no chance of winning the general election and, therefore, would love for him to be THE candidate.
I would suggest on winnowing down the crowd of GOP contenders and settle on Cruz (I am voting for him in the primary) or Santorum. Both smart guys with great things to say. Both are great contenders that would make for a tight race in 2016.
|
And you read the article in the link ?
Your post makes ZERO sense. Do you see some sort of conspiracy everytime someone says something that does not jibe with your thoughts ? Do you actually READ or simply make assumptions, and your post is rife with assumption.
I can assure you that after posting a liberal article by a liberal writer in a liberal paper and getting hammered for it, I will only discuss Ms Clinton. That is what the democrats, at least the closed mind ones on here, want.
Calling diversion by allowing for an article that plays to the liberals is a really unique attack. Your definition of diversion is different than mine for sure. From what was I diverting ?