Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
As (almost) usual, your post is a total crock. Being uniformed is one thing ... ignorance is another. Iraq didn't "tell" us anything ... they could read the tea leaves the Baracko wanted out one way or the other. STOP with the making of excuses for what even you can now recognize has turned into a complete disaster which stems from the 2011 withdrawal ... after we had it stabilized. Yes, would have been better never to have gone to Iraq BUT we were there so it had to be dealt with.
A leader leads ... Barack is not cut from that cloth. His latest (non) strategy is too timed to even merit contempt.
|
So, in your vast (or half vast) mindset, the US should have maintained a 30,000 troop presence in Iraq, given Iraq even more money, and be the security force for Iraq for the next umteen years?
What a great idea!
Bring back the real military warriors of GW Bush, Rumsfield, and Cheney and parachute them into the mess they created. You can go along with them, too, as their puppy dog.