Quote:
Originally Posted by mulligan
This seems, from the outside looking in, a breach of the district's fiduciary responsibility to the owners. Perhaps a query at the attorney general's office is in order.
|
Mulligan. I am surprised that you would say that.
The district was fined by an outside authority. Should they not pay the bill?
The district restored the trees. Are you suggesting they made money on it?
I honestly don't understand.
This is all originating from the St. John's or is it St. James River authority that is some agency protecting the wetlands and preserves. The district owns a bunch of wetlands and preserves. You aren't allowed to mess with them.
They will fine you. I don't see how paying the fine and restoring the trees is smarmy. You are just obeying the law.