I still do not understand why so many democrats so readily pronounce that Clinton is "most likely" their candidate.

Forget party, how can she be an acceptable let alone most likely candidate given all the issues including poor performance as secretary of state.

It certainly cannot be she is viewed as the only candidate that can carry the "young" vote...because she isn't. Or that she is the only candidate that can carry the female vote....because she is not.

So why do the democrats, at least at this point, so readily accept a person of tarnished character, that did a very poor job of secretary of state and whose honesty is openly suspect.

I object to requests asking to comparisons of republican candidates who can beat the spoiled merchandise of the democratic choosing....for now.

Try and remember she was the fair haired candidate in 2008 and was beat out by a relatively unknown, inexperienced and unqualified dark horse!