Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Wow, you are not only wrong on the issues, But homophobic as well. You know that it has been theorized that many, if not most homophobes, actually are repressing homosexual desires. Personal best regards.
|
Dear Guest: Again if you are going to hijack my closing at least show some class. Progressive misuse the term homophobic but then they have overreach on every issue.
But first a quick lesson SCOTUS unable to find any legal grounding for gay marriage in the US Constitution under either the due process clause or the equal protect clause of the 14th Amendment caused Justice Kennedy to mention nine times the word "dignity" in the majority opinion upon which Justice Thomas jokingly referred to as the dignity clause. In plain english their decision was politically and not legally decided. Perhaps you think what's the difference its a good thing. and my response is what next will SCOTUS find that offends them and they decide it needs to be fixed irrespective of the Constitution and the rule of law. Perhaps they will find people like you who misuse homophobic to be enemies of the state to be dealt with? the point being whose their next target? Banana Republics act this way not America
You honestly think the only reason people like me are against same sex marriage (an oxymoron in itself) is because we are homophobic that we fear and hate of gays. My friend its about the unnatural act. its about the fact that progressives are changing the meaning of a man and a woman Its about the state of marriage that has defined the union to be between one man and one woman throughout the ages. its about by its redefinition opening a pandora's box. If you think Roe v Wade stirred up a cultural war
this recent decision by SCOTUS is Roe v Wade on steroids
There was and had been in play every means available to the gay community to protect their rights secure their estates etc.
The push for same-sex marriage was about only one thing and that was a demand that gay sex be considered normal. Well progressive have a gift for euphemism such as man mad disasters meaning conflict they don't want to deal with, investment meaning entitlement and wealth redistribution schemes to reward lazy people or people who cant manage their lives.
Now they have invented a new euphemism the "new normal" like in Bruce Jenner their pin up ???????. In my view my compassion leans toward Bruce your troubled be troubled in private. Perhaps this is all a hoax meant to deliver a big jack pot . either way its degrading and i wonder where Kennedy's "dignity clause"fits?
Dignity begets dignity it can't be gifted. God (Nature if you prefer) biologically devised a man and woman to complement one another to procreate and children benefit from this experience of having both a mother and a father. Traditional family has been the bedrock of civilization since the beginning of time .
Personal Best Regards: