Quote:
Originally Posted by justjim
What the consulting engineer was saying in "terms" we understand: You can spend $300,000 and it won't hurt anything but it won't improve safety on the multi-modal paths in my expert opinion. In others words, you are throwing away $300,000 plus you will have a continuing maintenance issue down the road. 300,000 here and 300,000 there and soon it adds up to real money.
Sound like a committee decision similar to the committee that was designing a new breed of horse and came up with the camel.
|
what I said in post #11 btk amplified in post #14 and you validate here
What this topic validates is when the government chooses for you they always choose wrong. This is another example of using taxpayers money foolishly because government people believe money grows on trees...well at least in taxpayers (amenities payers) bank accounts...and these same government people still haven't let go of the indoor pool thingy