Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
You lost me, and I am sure others, when you mention Fox news. THAT is a dead giveaway as to how you work. You have seriously been indoctrinated and are unable to discuss facts because as all of those who seem to mention that, you have no idea of what is happening and have been told that going after a network is how to do it. No network changes the news...it is not hidden. Using a network to make your point is a bit desperate and obvious.
Not a defense of Fox by any means but what ever you think a news network has to do with ANYTHING is beyond me.
Secondly, if you have children or grandchildren, I suggest you do some investigation on where the Affordable Care Act is going to take our states and the federal budget in the future....I am sure you are aware it has not all kicked in as of yet.
Too late to repeal but it needs some serious work to save future disaster.
If you do not have children or grandchildren and do not care, sorry.
It has been said, and proven and not on Fox news, that the Democratic party is going so far left and then accusing the Republicans of going right. YES..the distance between them is greater but only one party is moving.
I suggest strongly that you read about your candidates..the two major ones and their radical backgrounds and their sharp turn left. Might help you a bit.
Sanders is so very very far left, he does not even call himself a democrat because they are not liberal enough and as far left as Clinton WAS, she is running left after him. You need to change those glasses
|
Dear Guest: I continue to hear the combination of Fox News and indoctrination in the same sentence which the speaker(you in this case) utilizes to denigrate both Fox News and its viewer. This appears to me to be a straw man argument. It also assumes that the Fox viewer is incapable of free thinking. If you watched Fox News you would have noted that it contains some of the best journalist around, some of whom work for the Wall Street Journal.. You would also note spirited debate between these various journalist, their guests etc.
While I dislike Bill O'Reilly's self importance demeanor one must admit he spares no democrat or republican embarassment. His points are often spot on. Megan Kelly's legal background makes her an excellent investigative journalist who is not afraid to ask the tough questions. Also excellent journalist Bret Hume and Bret Baer and let us not for the very liberal Mike Wallace's son. The Five represents both progressive and conservative views.
Could it be that Fox News is the most watched because it offers viewers a fair and balanced accounting of Washington, et al. Can it be that Fox viewers are looking for objective assessments? Does agreement connote only indoctrination or does agreement signify that what Fox reports viewers view as having the ring of truth?
Why is it, do you suppose that viewers are shunning CNN MSNBC, NBC , CBS ABC ? Why is it these stations spend more time discussing celebrities then covering Washington scandals and yet will spend days upon days beating up on conservatives?
I agree that in the field of journalism bias leaks through but we also know that the news media has always had a very liberal bent and up until Fox News came on the scene could get away with it without notice. Its why Obama the most powerful man in the world breaks presidential protocol and stoops so low as to strike out at Fox. Its like the head of a corporation picking on a file clerk in his corporation
The topic at hand is who against Clinton. I believe it is still too early to tell.
I was sent a long quiz and your answers and the weight of those answers told you who your likely choice would be. In my case 96% of my answers tracked with Marco Rubio and then the survey went down the line. The candidate not on my survey was Jeb Bush. Having said that my final decision will occur when I enter the poling booth because I want to ensure to myself that I am making my very best choice because this is a pivotal point for our nation
Personal Best Regards: