Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
I didn't gloss over anything. Did the IRS target Tea Party groups? When you put the Tea Party target on your chest, someone is going to shoot at it. The IRS thinks that they are answerable to nobody. They don't have a gun in their hands. They have a B52 loaded with smart bombs.
The law concerning 501(c)4 political charitable groups dates back to the early 50's and states that these groups can perform no political advertising/actions. There is another IRS regulation concerning activity by political action groups. In the late 50's, that was changed to no more than 50% political activity. However, the law was never changed. The IRS commissioner wants to enforce the law as written in the early 50's. There is no way that Congress to go back to the law as written. They will changed it to the way it is being enforced now, because it benefits both parties.
It was reported that McConnell had a meeting with other top Republicans prior to Obama accepting the oath of office with the purpose of how to deal with the new president. That's where they agreed to try and make a one term president. I don't know if McConnell or anybody in the Congress or President or his staff could pass the Pinocchio test. I guess you would have to look at the number of items that McConnell filibustered during that period to get an idea who is telling the truth. It is not worth the trouble.
Instead of goggling "Fox News Hypocrisy", try this. Comcast on demand, TV, The Daily Show on June 22nd. Jon Stewart has made a lot of money attacking Fox News, and the Republican party. Don't listen to what he has to say. Look at the Fox News clips that he is showing concerning the 9 deaths in SC, and the 2 policemen in New York City. Fox News reporters stated that Obama was politizing (sp) the 9 deaths in SC even before the victims were put in the ground. However, they did the same thing in the deaths of the two officers attacking both Obama and de Blasio before the first officer was put in the ground.
What problem did Reid have with the energy bill? What were the amendments? I truly don't know.
|
You are hard to keep up with.
You told a bold face lie relative to McConnell...I mean bold face made up stuff. Then you say "IT WAS REPORTED"....WHERE was it reported. This is an old wives tale oft times shown to be untrue in every aspect, and instead of admitting you told a lie and apologizing for it, you continue with the revisionist history. Most, who read BOTH SIDES know it is simply democratic folk lore yet despite knowing the truth you continue to repeat.
I did the googling at your request, and again you simply glide over the stupid links it brings, and remember there are the same links on the other side. THAT I will not argue with, but repeating downright fables and then just changing the link does not work with anyone who is remotely paying attention.
IRS...as I said, key person REFUSES to cooperate....much of the evidence was destroyed, so I make no claims as you do. I assume you have good solid info about how up front everything was. Sort of like ACORN was always an upright clean cut group UNTIL.
I actually find your posts amusing...no truth and very very old tales from wherever.
Real history is more important and you have proven so many times that you have no problem positives downright lies. You must be proud
Oh, and the politicizing of this tragic deaths and others ? I disagree on some and think it very clearly apparent he did on others, but I assure you that opinions do vary, and your disregard for any opinion except yours is very telling.
And since you never ever even read about all the Reid follies in the Senate, I must dismiss you as one who is led around by a movement and not facts. I can tell you what most left wing and right wing pundits are saying this morning, and then am in the process of reading more facts from both sides of the issues.
I am mocked and made fun of for my links, but I believe in knowing both sides, and if I am going to discuss it here or anywhere, be able to tell someone where they may validate what I am saying. Mouthing one sides line must be boring...you certainly learn nothing except some revised look at an issue, whether it be right or left.
But to simply tell lies and stand by them...not sure what there is to be said.