It is actually NOAA, not NOAH. NOAH built the Ark, but I digress.
Yes, some of the surface observations are "cooked" a bit to try to account for urbanization and perhaps changes in instruments/location. Surface observations are not the most reliable data if you have to "cook" it. I wonder about whether the amount of "cooking" is of the same magnitude as the warming signal that is being looked for.
One of the "problems" with the way science is funded is that research proposals are peer reviewed. In other words, they are reviewed by people doing the same research as you. Papers are also peer reviewed for publication.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justus
Those who don't believe that man-made global climate change is a religion, should at least read the recent speech and writings of Nobel Prize-winning physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever, saying this theory is "All wrong!"
NASA, along with NOAH, have been recently caught manipulating and manufacturing data on the subject, in order to maintain their funding. Unlike NASA and NOAH, Dr. Giaever has no financial interest in misrepresenting the facts. |