Politicians, especially lawyer trained politicians have no attachment what so ever to the realities of their constituency. That is why they (ALL) talk a good game and nothing gets done. UNless it is special interest, re-election or personal agenda driven.

When you talk in absolutes, you are usually proven wrong. If that was the case, we wouldn't have any social programs unless you throw social programs into the personal agenda category. Without a doubt especially now most of them fall into the category above. Low lifes! Kerry said the prisoners were brought up in every meeting. That is an absolute. So, he probably full of crap.

Doesn't it makes sense that there are prisoners from the other P5 plus one countries in jail also? They are probably not from Russia or China, but from the other three countries. If they weren't, why would our partners in these talks let our prisoners stop the agreement? Sometimes, we think to much of ourselves. We weren't the only country in the talks with Iran.

If we back out of the agreement, what is the alternative, especially if the UN countries think we are the problem not Iran? Sanctions from us and a few countries in Europe aren't worth a damn. Stop talking about Iran getting the bomb 10-15 years from now, talk about now. What the hell is the alternative now that we signed the agreement?