Maybe we can expound on the three choice presented by the Iran agreement in another post, agreement, no agreement, or war.

If Congress agrees with it by not overriding the veto, then the conversation ends there.

No agreement. Tom Cotton wants us to go back to the negotiation table, and make a better deal. That is totally unrealistic. The UN Security Counsel has approved the deal 15-0. The European alliance has removed oil against Iran, which was hurting their economies. Russia, and China probably won't accept any further sanctions against Iran, unless Iran violates the agreement. England, and France like the agreement. If Congress overrides the veto, we will be standing alone.

If Congress overrides the veto, they have to put forward what the acceptable alternative is. We do not have to live up to the agreement, but why should Iran care, what we do, if we are the only ones that object to the agreement. Once the agreement was reached by the P5 plus one, it was a pretty much a done deal.

So, the Republicans should do what they do best, bitch forever about Obama's irresponsible actions, and never but never offer an alternative. They have so cover on this one, because Democrats will have to go against their president to override the veto.

Talk about Obama's legacy. It will be enhanced, if all other countries abide by the agreement, and it works. Obama will have a "big I told you so".

War. Is not an alternative for us. However, Israel is another story.