Everyone has automatically assumed the restittion is being offered to one of the folks who live on that street that allgedly did the deed.
Some other hypothesis?
The no questions asked restitution offer could be for anyone responsible. For example what if one of the listers of the property for sale where the trees were removed was a guilty party? I am not saying they are but one guess is as good as another with no proof to date.....that we are aware of anyway.
Or how about some "agent" of TV (take a wild guess...any could suffice for this example) was responsible. Not possible? Probably not, but stranger things happen. I can just visualize somebody on the named street calling whoever to report trees being cut down in a protected area. The report is processed. Then all of a sudden there is a loud and thunderous.....OH S**T!
Just like folks on TOTV like to play games like 3 word sentences or word continuation.....how about other possibilities.
To date I have not heard anything that is publicly available tha would allow me to accept with a reasonable doubt that it was in fact one of the home owners. Certainly they are the most likely suspects.
As I have posted previously I am suspect at how quickly the folks at TV rolled over and announced they were picking up the tab. Things like this just do not move that quickly in TV.
I may be as wrong as wrong can be but I am entitled to how I see it.
Assigning the cause to the "wealthy" as some few would trumpet only shows lack of understanding. I would be willing to bet a beer there are more wealthy people living in non premier homes in TV than there are in premier homes. Additionally there are no doubt many non wealthy people living in premier homes......anyway the fantasy of wealth at the root of the issue is a lark....for some few.
OK let the creativity flow like a good mystery.
|