This should really make you laugh, but I am dead serious here. The responsible Republican I was thinking of was "W". This would be in the vain of Nixon, staunch anti-communist, visiting China to try to normalize relations with them. "W's" mere appearance there would give Iran the unmistakable impression that we want a deal, but we are not going to roll over for it. He was also knowledgeable on Iran.

President Obama had a news conference, where he defended the deal against all the short comings that the Republicans, Israel and the press had brought up. Reduction in uranium centrifuges, explain why the 24 waiting period wasn't a problem, UN could follow the flow of nuclear material to Iran, they would find out if Iran was building up nuclear material in other countries, some MIT nuclear professor told him nuclear material give off a detectable scent, which easily can be detected etc. He covered everything. He certainly doesn't believe he totally rollover, a deal just for the sake of a deal. If Iran cheats, President Obama won't be president, when that happens. People don't listen to him now, so why would they listen to him then?

I hope that you not applying that Iran will be selling weapons to ISIS. You know that that is not going to happen. The Muslims sects hate each other more than they hate us.

Iran will never be a nuclear threat to us. Going to war with Iran will be a lot harder than it was going to war with Iraq. Iran is one step above a third world country.

The arms flow isn't going to go from Iran directly to the terrorists. That stunt was stopped in one big hurry by our Navy, when Iran tried to send weapons to the Yemen terrorists. They will go from the seller to the terrorists, and Iran will be billed.

Not until the Republicans do a 90 not a 180 degree turn to the center, every conversation is going to have a hostile ring to it, but there is never an excuse for name calling.