Quote:
Originally Posted by Polar Bear
I said devil's advocate and was just making a point...answering ridiculous with ridiculous. Assuming there are four and only four suspects is just as ridiculous.
( And are you sure they left behind 100% of the wood? Or did they just want it to look that way so everybody would assume there are only four suspects??!!?? [emoji23] )
|
OK, if that is a "ridiculous" assumption then give me some non-ridiculous reasons why anyone else would have done this, or caused this to be done, other than for the view? And if, in fact, it was for the view, how many homes do you really think had their view improved by the cutting, thus giving them a motive? And I think we've already had the "cutting for the wood" theory adequately addressed by Madelaine Amee.