Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
There is no federal law that stopped her from using a personal server.
Did she destroy emails that belonged to the state department? She might have, but how are you going to prove it?
Turn the mails to the fifth Benghazi investigation. You know the current one that the Chairman Trey Gowdy called a prosecution. That one. The one that is going to last until November, 2016. Given all the leaks out of these hearing, can you blame any candidate for not handing private emails over to the opposing party in the current world of politics.
Should she have handed the server to an independent party? No! She should sat there with an independent party, and gone over the emails one by one. However, the server should have never left her sight, or the independent party's sight.
Trust is a two way street. Only a fool would trust the Republicans with anything personal or not.
|
You are wrong. There IS federal law against what she did. I know because I worked for the Dept of State in IT. Make your ridiculously ignorant comments all you wish, but saying it doesn't make it so. Defend the criminal desperately. She has embarrassed your party and you have no one else to run, other than the admitted Socialist, Sanders. And he would NEVER get the Independent vote.
She has NO private emails once she admits that she was using the server for gov work. All her work becomes gov property, including anything private she puts on it. Sorry, but once again you have been proven wrong.
Should her email be turned over to a private party? NO. The IG should have first been involved and then if they deemed it possible of criminal mischief, they should have called in the FBI. Admittedly, the present FBI is controlled by the top criminal in the White House and it would immediately be buried. He doesn't want anyone to suspect his obvious incompetence.
