Originally Posted by Guest

You are so busy trying to attack anyone that doesn't agree with you that you turn around and make his case for him.

The original statement that was made by a former government IT person was, When Hillary used her personal server for government business, it became government property. Is there any doubt that that statement was made? Did I make up the above statement? Did I misinterpret the above statement? Is there any doubt what the statement says? No! Good! Let's proceed.

Look above at the statements highlighted in red. Now read what comes next very carefully, and very slowly. Logic 101. If Hillary's personal server was government property, why didn't Trey Gowdy request no demand that she send her former server, which is now government property, to HIM DIRECTLY? Why send it to a third party? All Hillary's personal emails on her former server were government property to do with as they saw fit. The only logical conclusion is Hillary's personal server is still her personal property, and not government property.

Concerning the person that highlighted items above in red, I am pretty sure you are a reasonable person. Do you think that Hillary's personal server became government property, when she used it for government business despite any evidence to the contrary?

Concerning the whatever that posted directly below him, what a matter didn't mommy give you enough attention, when you were a baby. This could be the sixth time that I said this. I will vote for a Republican governor that accepted the Medicaid provision under the ACA, because that governor puts the people in his state before his party. That is a man of character. I don't want Hillary to be the next president. That is why I would vote for Sanders. It has nothing to do with him, and everything to do with her. A vote for Sanders is a vote against Hillary. Please save your stupid statements for someone that actually gives a crap.