Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Post# 17. There IS federal law against what she did. I know because I worked for the Dept of State in IT. She has NO private emails once she admits that she was using the server for gov work. All her work becomes gov property, including anything private she puts on it. Sorry, but once again you have been proven wrong
Post# 22 All personal emails become government property once she used the server for government business. OK, Mr. IT answer this. "Why did Trey Gowdy ask Hillary to send her server to an independent third party? If he had very right to view her private emails, why not send the server directly to himself?
Post# 34 How come you didn't answer the question about Trey Gowdy? If Hillary's personal server was government property the second she used it for government business, why did he demand that Hillary send the server to an independent third party instead of himself? We know the answer to that question, her personal server ISN'T government property.
Post# 42 Try a third time. HILLARY"S PRIVATE SERVER ISN"T GOVERNMENT PROPERTY!!!!!
If her private server was government property, why did Trey Gowdy ask for government property to be sent to an independent third party? As a lawyer, Trey Gowdy knows that it isn't GOVERNMENT PROPERTY!!!!!!!
Where was the question answered? I do have to admit that question did change a little. It was my mistake, and it wasn't intention. The original comment was contents on her server was government property, as I stated in post 22. In post 34 and 42, I stated that the server was government property. However, the jest of the question is still the same, whether the server or just the contents were government property doesn't matter. Trey Gowdy asked either of the above be sent to an independent third party. The only logical conclusion is that her private emails aren't government property as was stated in post 17. No one has contracted this. If so, what post?
|
Who cares
No matter what, we will spend the next 15 months with Ms Clinton, as mentioned earlier, parsing every word as her husband did when he was lying.
And those of you who love this rich, scandal ridden lady will defend her over and over.
She is a liar, manipulator and you seem to be one of her "manipulatees"
How the Democratic Party allowed themselves to get stuck like this is certainly "book worthy"
Every scandal, and every breath of scandal about her, and I do realize that none of this should reflect on her in anyway. It is either that doggone right wing conspiracy or the fault of George Bush.
You can call everyone on here all the names you wish, you are dreaming if you think this is the last scandal or that this woman deserves your trust.
Argue with the parsing, but as in her husbands case, she is not a truthful person, so stand up and be counted.