Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Is this still the US? Innocent until proven guilty seems only to apply to Democrats. Splitting hairs! When you are asked a question, how about doing something that is totally out of character, and answer the question. If you haven't noticed, not one Republican here has ever admitted ever being wrong. When they are wrong on a thread, they just stop posting on the thread.
All of President Obama's trumped up scandals, and Hillary's to date don't amount to a pi$$ hole in the snow to people that are open minded. The only thing that they are good for is to give the Republicans in Congress something to do. This enables them to feel good about themselves, and gives them talking points back in the home districts/states.
I think that a lot of Republicans here have a memory of convenience. I seem to be one of her lap dogs. That is truly funny. I am not going to go back and find out how many times I have said the following. Hillary has been running for president since the mid 90's. No woman would stand by her man, after her man subjected her to worldwide humiliation, if she didn't need him for something. Her something was the Senate first, and then the White House becoming multi-millionaires was a side benefit.
If John Kasich isn't the Republicans choice for president, I am going to vote for Donald Duck. I want our next president to be someone that puts party affiliation aside as much as possible, and works with the other side for the good of all Americans. He seems to be the only one now that fits the bill.
The Republicans wouldn't have the control of the Senate and House, if it wasn't for President Obama's color, and Gerrymandering. Voting based on color is a two way street. Does anybody think for a second the Tea Party wasn't given birth, because of His Blackness? I am amazed that anyone would even throw out there that Republicans are the only ones that are well informed, vote base upon a person's record, and the policies that he will bring with him to the White House.
Name Calling! I wasn't on this board five minutes, and was called so many names that I thought they were handing out prices for rudeness here.
|
All I want to do is ask this poster just a few things. Engaging in discussion does not seem to be the strong point of this poster.
1. You level and have leveled some accusations at "Republicans" on this board. How do you know the party affiliation of the posters ?
2. You level a lot of accusations based on the Presidents race, more than once or twice. I find that to be offensive and ask what color has to do with it ? You level the same charge at the Tea Party and before you accuse, I am not a member. THOSE are charges leveled at the lowest street level of democratic politics. They do not, nor ever have had any credence, and allow me once again to express my disgust with your constant talk of race. THAT issue is one brought up only by democrats who do not understand the policies. If you oppose someone and they happen to be black, you are NOT a racist but that seems to be mantra which I thought had begun to die until you.
3. Your comments about trumped up charges that are leveled only at Democrats manifests your total lack of knowledge. And since they do not amount to whatever gross expression you used, then I suppose the majority of americans not trusting your candidate is just as she always says another right wing conspiracy.
There is no perfection in person or party. Your posts are pretty much aimed at one defending another and that is your right, but base it on facts, and not on this stupid divisive race thing. If race was an issue, no matter how many black votes he got he would not be the President.
As far as name calling, you seem to excel and I sure wish we could extend the ignore button to political because you certainly deserve that.
You appear to be loaded with a lot of hate and again, that is ok if you want to unload it here but at least do it with facts.
Your candidate that you defend is not even trusted by most americans, yet you appear to trust her. I am not sure how you arrived at one of your many JUDGEMENTS about innocent before guilty but it sure is not based on any fact at all.
You make this about PARTY on almost every post. Try just once to focus on issues of character and trust. Have you read about the Swiss bank and their ties to the Foundation ? I know, again those doggone Republicans just saying those things. Have you read about all the women who are waiting in the wings to tell us about her hubby, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, what he said about his wife ?
There are more serious character issues involved in this campaign than I can recall ever. I am not speaking of religion, race or anything except SERIOUS character flaws and judgement flaws.
I leave you with the last few sentences of an op ed from today on Hillary Clinton entitled "The astonishing weakness of Hillary Clinton".
"Clinton just seems like a mismatch for the party and the moment. The center-left darling of Wall Street talking up issues of inequality. The former Walmart board member posing as savior of American jobs. The "Smart Power" leader whose achievement at state was wrecking a nation and turning it over to Sunni terrorists faster than George W. Bush. A champion of women who pretended the leader of the free world was the victim of his intern. The wife of a man who flies on the "Lolita Express" with a porn star that was booked for "massages." The vanquisher of a Yonkers mayor.
Is this really the best the Democrats can do? Yes, and that should worry them."
The astonishing weakness of Hillary Clinton
You can call everyone you want a racist,,,,Tea Party, Republicans, etc.....that has been going on since President Obama became a candidate, but for what is it worth, that kind of talk simply makes me stop reading. You claim NOT to be a supporter but spend most of your posts doing just that by attacking anyone who is NOT a supporter.