Thank you Mr. Personal Best Regards for posting a response to my post. I was beginning to think that you, and the person that posted directly below you, were one and the same. If that was the case, there would be no reason to continue to post here.
What is the difference between the Village Tea Party, and the KKK? In the serious department, that is over the top, and just not right. Nobody is as bad as the KKK. In the just kidding department, the KKK won't be the target of the IRS, if they apply for a 501(c)4 charitable political organization classification. I don't think the KKK has any need to place political ads on TV.
That was my post. What am I making up there to fit my purpose? My purpose maybe be for you to see the light of day. That's is fool's errand. I was that fool, but no more. If your remarks were sarcastic, that is the best sarcasm I have ever seen.
Has this president with the help of Harry Reid pushed issues concerning blacks? Of course, they have. Why would anyone expect that he wouldn't? Tying the Tea Party to the KKK was nonsense. However, given the timing of the birth of the Tea Party, and their over the top signs at the Tea Party's first Washington gathering, anyone that thinks that there weren't any racial overtones there, are just kidding themselves.
I think that this was you, but I could be wrong concerning the new tax id laws, the new tax id laws were directed at both WHITES AND BLACKS. The question that I asked in response, and has never been answered is, if the Penn. new tax id laws weren't directed at inner city blacks, then how do you explain the leader of the Penn. house comment, "We just gave Penn. to Romney?"
The color of this president's skin has fueled racism of both parties to unbearable levels. Couple that with the press's coverage of any event that fits in with their racial leanings, should make any person with an open mind to throw up.
Given the sides both parties seemed to have taken concerning immigration reform, racism is going to continue with just a different minority taking center stage.
The question ask what is the difference between Socialism, and the Democrats is a loaded question. Just because the Democrats have adopted some socialist ideas, that doesn't make them socialists. I am sorry, but Republicans have thrown out there that Socialism is a swear word, and all Democrats should run away from it. Why do the extremes of both parties get to dictate all the political conversation that I going on in the country today?
In that same vein, Donald Trump has stated several times, that he will win the black, and Hispanic vote, because he will bring jobs back to the US from China, and other overseas countries. I am a job creator. He won't have time to explain how that will be done in Thursday's debate. Capitalist sent those jobs overseas. If he is going to bring jobs back, isn't he going to have to attack capitalism? Since the difference in pay here versus overseas is so great, I can't see any incentive plan that could offset the difference in pay. He is a hellva lot smarter than I am (the understatement of the year), but the devil is in the details. Hopefully, sometime before Nov, 2016, if he is successful in becoming the Republican nominee, he will explain some of the details.
|