Quote:
Originally Posted by dbussone
I hate the idea of electronic records. Just imagine all the hacks on federal sites like OPM...and when the fed grabs all electronic records we will all be hung out to dry.
|
Consider this:
My practice has been using electronic records for 12 years. It can be "hacked", but you have to get through 2 firewalls with dual level 128 bit encryption then a series of software passwords, and this assumes you know the network architecture. This is about the same as hacking a bank
Prior to Nov 2003, when we had paper records, all you needed to "hack" them was a screwdriver and a crowbar. (And all you needed to destroy them was a match). So what do you think is more secure?