Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedivergirl
Yes. She should stay squeaky clean. I agree somethings not right. Numerous reports that the punched woman had hold of the puncher's shirt.
I thought that could be construed as an assault, giving the line dancer the right to self defense, ie punching her.
If there had to be an arrest, I think it should have been both women, 'til the facts are sorted by the court. Both women should be in the public record, not just the dancer.
I can't promise what I'd do if someone was chest-bumping and taunting me, and then grabbed my shirt.
I know it is a report from only one person, but it rings true: You'll have to dig it up yourself. Apparently I've found The Paper Who Must Not Be Named.
|
If what you say is true when she has her court date she can have people testify this other person had hold of her. I would think she had a right to protect herself. I also believe the villages may have a problem in how this was handled. Is the other person involved connected to someone? Is she even a resident? Maybe the line dancer needed to press charges also when the officer cited her. Something does not add up here.