Dear Guest: so let me get this straight if the Supreme Court decides that eminent domain should be expanded to include entire cities being removed for the benefit of the government it would be the law of the land and we better get use to it.? Dred Scott (circa 1887) affirming slavery was the law of the land so should blacks have just accepted their fate?

I don't care what people do in their private lives but the decision made was pure politics and deeply flawed as was Roe v Wade. Even the plaintiff in the Roe case regretted her decision and fights for its repeal.

So here we are deeply divided over another issue that if handled properly would have prevented this wide divide.

Despite what the Supreme court ruled biology clearly defines a man ans woman and their respective roles in marriage and procreation. And despite trans gender operations etc the DNA clealy speaks to the sex of this individual .

Personal Best Regards: