Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Six points difference between the two worst candidates for president?
View Single Post
 
Old 08-19-2015, 07:10 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Six points difference between the two worst candidates for president?

Today's polls suggest that the two top candidates Clinton and Trump are separated by 6 points.

I hope that we are not going to have to choose from the two worst contenders for out next president. America is in a way too precarious position right now to have to "settle for" two power hungry celebrities just to provide for good media coverage for the next four years.

Clinton: Untrustworthy, liar, cold and uncaring, and greedy

Trump: Flip-flopping loose cannon.

Can't the two parties come up with better representatives to run for their party? The Dems have an excuse. They have no one that believes enough in their party. The Republicans have plenty of good, viable candidates but the voters are so angry at the last 8 years that they want revenge more than course correction for the country. Ideologies aside, America better get back on a moral and ethical track or Obama's efforts to destroy our way of life is going to succeed. There used to be a very fine line separating the ideologies of the two parties. Republicans have become more moderate and Dems have become more left leaning semi-socialists. In order to become a strong, leader of countries again Americas are going to have to be more strong and independent. They are going to have to start pulling their own weight and quit leaning on - demanding more from the rest of the country. If those that CAN will start pulling their own weight, then those that can't will not have to worry so much about surviving on the left overs. There are way too many that can, that have given up hope and decided that it is better to say they can't than to have to struggle and work to pull themselves up. What happened to American pride? What happened to those that had too much pride to take welfare and food stamps when they qualified, and instead, worked two or three jobs to support their families?

Are we going to settle for one of the two worst possible candidates for our next leader?

Are you going to choose the one that has to defend her ethical behavior and disregard national security with a "what difference does it make." Or, are you going to choose the bull in a china shop, that may have good intentions but alienates even those that would support him? Why do we have to "settle for?"