Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran
First, I didn't post the post about debunking the AP article. The above is really long. However, it gives you the history of conflict between Iran and IAEA.
Apply a little common sense, if possible. Given the history between the two why would the IAEA give Iran anything that it wants, especially after the P5plus1 agreement with Iran. The IAEA is now going to look the other way, so Iran can cheat on the agreement that took close to two years to agree upon. How does that make any sense?
|
Well, whomever, you are once again changing the subject for some inexplicable reason.
Nobody has criticized the IAEA.
Here is my take and my criticism.
1. Iran has not allowed anyone in the world to inspect Parchin since I think 2005. It has been the subject of much suspicion.
2. We enter into negotiations with Iran and are told there will be no concessions that will be good for Iran.
3. We find out
because of the media that there are secret agreements. If they don't break it, we never know.
4. But we are assured...nothing here to see.
5. NOW,
because of the media, not our administration, that there is an agreement that
Iran will conduct inspection of their own military installation that has been the subject of years of confrontation
You are turning this as if there is some kind of criticism of IAEA. My problem is with this administration who knew all this and said not one word to anyone. My problem is that we negotiated as we are told the best deal possible and this little tidbit is not discussed.
Please do not be insulting to talk about the IAEA....that is not the point at all and never was. Why you make it that is beyond me.