Why would the whole village be under suspicion? Who was accusing the whole village of being responsible? I believe it was likely from the start that the a small number of homes may have been involved. I don't believe the whole village has been tainted. Even if there was someone who claimed a village wide conspiracy, who really cares?
Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl
I tried several times to say that we are constantly asked to pay through our taxes for people's actions when they break the law, destroy property, and do wrong things. When a thief is chased in a stolen car and hits a light pole and tears up property, who pays? When a person lies to get disability or welfare, who pays? It happens every day and it is wrong, wrong, wrong. I think it is clear that someone or all the folks in the homes discussed time and time again were the ones responsible. I don't know them, and really never want to know them and I would imagine that would be a general response. I haven't read ANYONE making excuses for them.
I have said that they probably don't have a lot of friends at the Lake Miona pot luck.
What bothered me is that the whole village was under suspicion by some posters and that just isn't fair. I am sure they had some very strong inklings but I never thought that every man jack or woman jack was covering up for them.
I also didn't think the district and the developers were part of a conspiracy. They have to pay the bills and follow the laws of agencies such as this one who found out about the tree cutting and lowered the boom.
|