GG, I was following the water boil post as it was happening, and just re-read it. The original question was fine, the premise appeared doubtful.
To reiterate, your response was:
"I am on the list to receive these notices and to say they are frequent or daily is a gross exaggeration.
I believe that this is another exaggerating negative post. I challenge you to send us the daily links you have received this week, OP.
They only send them as a "boil water notice" when a line has been broken and they give the vicinity and street of the break. "
Were you vigorously defending TV---of course, you always do
Was it rude---I don't think so
Is it appropriate to request proof when a statement seems unlikely to be true?--yes, just wait for the presidential debates!
Were the two subsequent request for proof aggressive?--maybe a little, but the OP wasn't responding to the question (maybe she's a politician)
Does your apology show grace, charm, and maturity?---ABSOLUTELY!!
Now, let's look at the immediate response to your post from the OP:
"I receive these notices DAILY- I cannot speak on the emails you receive GRACIEGIRL I can only state on the emails I am receiving. Honestly I do not appreciate your comment indirectly calling me a liar - BEWARE The internet bully is in full force tonight!!!!!! It's SAD that someone can't come onto this site and ask a question without receiving a negative comment from GRACIEGIRL!!! So sick of the nonsense!!! And I am sure the Graciegirl Posy will attack me now too!! "
All I can say here is Res ipsa loquitur
(and that unless you have your own species of flower named after you, the OP probably meant posse)
It looks to me that whole tone of the OP's statement appears that she was already "loaded for bear" or extremely over-defensive
So now that you have apologized for your small role, I challenge the OP to man (?woman) up and do the same. And GG---keep those posts coming.
|