Originally Posted by Guest

Ah yes. Clinton, lawyer trained, knows when to say it is not illegal as provided by the letter of the law. Knows she can claim having not done anything wrong dependent upon her confidence that someone may or may not be able to prove guilt.

Just try to find some where in the law books where it states that wiping a server clean is illegal. Of course you will not find it. But to add the appropriate qualifiers as in wiping the server clean of................that requires the accuser to prove that it was in fact there, as stated, and cleaned, as stated.

Did you ever see the law adds here in TV when he says just one word can make a difference. What the word is. If the word was used. If the word was not used. What was before the word? After the word?

Using, abusing or hiding behind the letter of the law.
How else can be said about those who at times have to defend murderers and rapists? Create doubt.