|
09-03-2015, 06:20 PM
|
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,873
Thanks: 14,339
Thanked 5,110 Times in 1,956 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bagboy
Using that reasoning, based on the fact the POA lawsuit was dismissed, does that not show that the information and facts supporting the developer and district published in the DS were truthful? And on the short end of the stick, the information and facts presented by the POA in their publication have not been truthful?
|
Based on the dismissal of the lawsuit I would look into the background of the judge before assuming anything!
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato
“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine
|