
09-04-2015, 05:33 AM
|
Platinum member
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Villages
Posts: 1,554
Thanks: 40
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwitch
Sigh. First, a lawsuit being dismissed is absolutely irrelevant. Just because there is no LEGAL cause of action does not mean something unfair did not occur. The court gave plaintiffs three tries to get the complaint worded properly. Their attorney never succeeded. Complaints can be dismissed with or without prejudice for several reasons -- lack of jurisdiction, no cause of action, etc.
General Managers are usually selected by a board or committee, not elected. Their job is to take charge of daily issues, create and maintain a budget. They don't make policy, they enforce policy. So, Janet Tutt not being a TV resident is irrelevant. She does a good job given the constraints on her position. Frankly, I'd be more worried if her loyalties didn't lay with the developer.
As to who told the truth and who lied, I have no idea. I don't even have a real sense what the lawsuit was about and have no intention of reading the pleadings to find out. Normally, the truth lies somewhere between two opposing sides. They're both going to say what it takes to come across looking good.
This is a dead horse beaten up in the courts and behind the scenes long before anything was made public. (And I'm very pro POA.)
|
Thanks, Red.
|