Two comments.

One if "they" want to affect the acknowledging of your vote, why have to re do it? Since Dean has said no, no thou shalt following my ruling and not be counted because ye did not heed the rules...."they" are looking for the next least resistant avenue that will allow their wants. Where does it stop?
Oh let's do a re do in OHIO because it snowed. Or one in XYZ because there was inclement something or other!
If they want the votes to count get after to Dean to change his mind set and not allow bastardizing the voting system when a candidate says hey how about trying this or changing that.

The term angry white men is like calling all copiers Xerox. It actually started as a group of white men (like it or not)...they can spotlight themselves just as the rest of the minority groups do to suit their purpose. It had nothing to do with gender or masculinity or gaining it, loosing it or enhancing it. They stand for bringing back to this country the concept of majority rules and eliminate political correctness. Turns out their were blacks, tans, girls, boys, other non white men and women who whole heartily agreed (all together I think it is the silent majority trying to find a way to wake up).....so they said I agree.....
to focus on the angry white men terminology misses the more important issue.........people who finally want to do something to restore this country back to it's core values......

But to each his/her/their own....y'all are entitled to your opinion...at least until some special interest groups get the rules changed.

BTK ;D