Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Typically extreme opposite view, from the "can't be done" clan.
We all know that the constitution has never been changed since it construction, right? Sure.
We also know that the founders did NOT make the constitution to have it perverted to every liberal cause. I am not suggesting mandating a religion. I said either blah blah or none. I also said that exceptions case by case. This is national security and the gov voids the constitution in national emergency situations.
Obama violates the law all the time, and disobeys the supreme court. Are you saying it's ok for him to do it because he is black, or is he held to the same standard as the rest of America?
What's wrong with stipulations on voting rights? Oh, I get it. It might "disenfranchise" the minority voter. Kind of like the voter ID myth that it would disenfranchise the minority voter. Amazing how much the left suddenly is concerned about the minority after history proves that Democrats have always been a hindrance to their freedom.
As far as the farmers are concerned, sooooo? If they can't hire anyone, it's because they won't pay enough. If they have to increase the cost of their product, but harvest it legally, then I'm all for it. A study was done a long time ago that suggested that if you got rid of all the illegal migrants, the cost to each American for groceries would increase by $8 per year. Now, it's been a while so we would have to adjust for inflation.
But, we are a country of laws. You contradict yourself in one comment. You talk about the 1st Amendment and then want to look the other way when it comes to illegals. That is really a problem in America, isn't it? One law is good because you like it, and the other law is bad because it might cost you.
No disrespect meant to you. I am just debating the issues with you. I respect your opinion and you are right about the Religion thing. One can only try though.
|
We all know, which party is always waving the flag, always wanting to go back to the Constitution when it agrees with them, dismisses the Supreme Court, when a ruling goes against them. Right? Sure!
Mandating a religion. No, you just want to get of one, the Muslims. All of them are a direct threat to our national security. Mass punishment is a lazy man's way of correcting a problem. "Discourage or ban Muslims." Why stop there? Getting rid of a religion almost worked before in one country, and we are exceptional so we should be able to get the job done the right way. Like the religious leader said in Gunga Din, "Kill or be killed? Kill! Kill! Kill!" This comment goes right back to the person that made the original post that I addressed, and not you.
There are only around 3 million Muslims in the US. No big deal. If we can deport 11 million illegals, we won't even break up a sweat in killing 3 million Muslims. Sieg heil!
Voter id law is a myth. I will ask for the seventh time, Please explain the comment made by the Penn. Speaker of the House, when their voter ID law was passed, "We just gave Penn. to Romney."
The reason Americans don't want to do the work on farms isn't the pay, and it's the hard work, and long hours.
Concerning the illegal immigrants, why wasn't the bipartisan Senate bill voted upon in the House several years ago? If it had, Obama wouldn't have issued his executive order on immigration. If the Republicans were worried about giving the illegals a path to citizenship, because they wouldn't vote for them, then don't give them a path to citizenship. Trump has got to be kidding with his statement deport 11 million illegals, and then bring back the good ones. Again, a simple solution to a complex problem, which is a lazy man's special.
I read somewhere today, and I am not going to look for the article, that 40% on the Muslims in the US were US citizens that converted to the religion. We will be inflicting punishment on our own. How is that acceptable. Again, wasn't that tried WW2 with the Japanese, and we have admitted our mistake? Right!